Browsed by
Author: Bartleby

Poems to stop the evil

Poems to stop the evil

Your own wound; your secret wound.
Their own wounds, announced and not.
Our own wounds, exaggerated and underknown.
Commingling here, somehow together.

It was a terrible thing, what the British did,
allying with the Tutsi against the Hutu,
creating a minority power to ensure loyalty through the bullying.
It was a terrible thing, what the Hutu did,
slaughtering the Tutsi out of rage and spite–
so many years after, fueled by tales old and new.

How bad the bad when the French lords,
in pomp and splendor,
bled the people in their squalor.
But then the Revolution: how mean the blades,
how mad the logic, how Godless the certainty.

Peace and love for all,
the freedom of privacy,
of coming and going–
of course, of course.

North Korea, from across the most sparkling sea,
with a missile can now strike us in our bright
and comfy towns.
So what now?

The globe, so diverse in chitchat, in opinion,
home to me in this happy little respite
from history,
snuck out here with my living room,
fresh organic produce,
Netflix subscription,
French, Spanish, and poetry Meetups.
But everyone now knows about terrorism,
about loose nuclear materialism,
about the notion that infinite wrongs
could be righted by my death,
your death, our dying out,
the collapse of our grand systems
of law, commerce, fun and study.
So what now?

We children,
some more privileged than others,
of a big, fat inland empire.
Some more honest than others.
some kinder than others.
some wiser than others.
Children of Democracy writ large and strong.

The mystic poet seer genius types
say all is well, all is one,
all flows from and to the same
sweet giggling innocence,
that the Light keeps getting brighter
until we all realize that there’s nothing else–
never was.
OK, sure,
cool.

Trump lies and people say that’s just politics.
It isn’t. It’s the cynicism of a people who’ve given up
on Democracy, but figure it turns out it wasn’t such a big deal after all–
seeing as they still have gasoline in the eager tanks and sunlight in their pretty eyes.

We’ll rally together for good government,
for openness and fairness in government,
for rule of law and the dignity of the process,
for the ends don’t justify the means,
or we’ll swell up and bloat and pop in chaos.

Or maybe we get lucky, or unlucky–
it’s always a bunch of things all swirling together,
and only cranks and other radicals pretend it’s the one gold tooth
that can be held up to glint in the relentless justice of their unforgiving sun.

Anyway,
the evil,
the mistake,
the cruelty,
the greed,
the pursuit of a world where deceit and heartlessness is rewarded,
where honesty and kindness really are just for suckers
and the handful of saints who somehow really do know for sure and shining through it all without question that Love is the final, the irrevocable vote.
But, no matter the speeches at funerals, most of us are not saints.
We are in-betweeners, and in a system where decency is reasonably compatible with pleasant-living, we have nice lives and slide into heaven, but otherwise we are mean and brutal and confused and slip down to hell.

What is the balance between individual freedom, rights, responsibility;
And the system within which we’re enmeshed?
How to push oneself, and the chords of society, culture, friendship–
the ties of other that wind round and through us–
how to push out from within, to push it all towards the better,
towards enough protection from grinding teeth, dancing knives, whirring lies
to breathe in joy, create and share,
explore and grow
wiser
by the dusty rocks
laced by thumby scrag-brush more brown than green,
in the brightest morning sunlight
tucked in on all sides with cool desert morning air,
free to roam and enjoy without stealing another’s way,
without breaking our everyman vow
to be ourselves in aware kindness.

How to proceed?,
we ask ourselves.

AMW/BW

Was soll ich tun?

Was soll ich tun?

Ich lebe einfach so, nicht weit entfernt des Parks.
Alles is so ungefahr akzeptabel. Ich kann nicht klagen.
Als ich jung war spazierte ich gern den Bach entlang.
Mit dreizehn durfte ich mit meinem Fahrrad den Grossen See besuchen.
Ich fahrte Rad an kurvigen Wegen vierzig Fussen ueber Lake Erie.
Zwei Fusse links und stuertzte ich vom Kliff herunter.
So eine Risiko wuerde ich jetzt nicht gern akzeptieren.
Damals aber bemerkte ich den Gefahr nur beilaeufig.

Deine Zauber binden wieder
was die Mode streng verteilt.

Wir zerstreut verflossene Kinder
die Dein Gunst flehend suchen
leben weiter im Nebel munter
hinter gluehenden Scheinwerfern
mitten deiner regnischen Naechten.

Ich und dich und alles
was dazwischen gafft und lacht
was die Nacht uebereinsamwacht
was uns hebt und schnell vergisst

AMW/BW

Arbeit Macht Krank

Arbeit Macht Krank

Du hast gehoert, und da oben gelesen, dass die Arbeit frei mache.
Ich aber bin hier dir zu sagen, dass die Arbeit ganz bestimmt krank macht.

Du hast gehoert, und selber erfaehrt, dass die Arbeit schlank macht.
Ich aber bin hir um mitzuteilen, dass die Schlankheit nicht ausreicht.

Wer kann klagen? Wer kann mit ernstem Gesicht seine Arbeit beschimpfen?
Hier heutzutage ist es alles ganz leicht, ganz einfach, ganz bequem.

The Love’s Suitor

The Love’s Suitor

Every day we look in her eyes and call her to our side.
Every night we cuddle up into little melon balls and slide
between her ways and inside her minds as best we can
asking for friendship and anything that might stand
through the waves and the gibbers that toss and turn
through the quicksilver, moon-eyed, dark-soot night.

When but a lad running on the beach, footprints damp
and filling with water, fingers soft with light and sand,
I caught you in my arms, and held you close to my chest
thin and tanned with the salt in the air full of zest.

I know who you are
and I’m here to report
I know what you love
and I’m here to agree
I know what you see
up there from above
and I’m here to shove
aside all that would
divide us.

On Philosophical Systems

On Philosophical Systems

I once overheard some desperate wag declare, “Der Wille zum System ist ein Mangel an Rechtschaffenheit.” [“The will to a system is a lack of integrity!”]

What was he talking about? What is a philosophical system? Why is creating or supporting or using them reprehensible? What was he talking about?

A philosophical system is a framework that explains everything essential: what can be known, what is true, how you should live. It is a complete philosophy. And you can put it on like you’d put on a religion. You can wear it. It has grooves into which you can slide your intellectual and emotional thoughts, and it also has an interface with both perceptions and Reality (assuming the system believes in a Reality). So it allows your ideas and feelings to relate adequately to themselves, each other, your daily experience, and (sometimes at least) Reality.

The problem with philosophical systems is that they are just built of ideas, but human life is ideas, feelings, vague notions, and whatever-all-else. So how can a human being expect a contraption made entirely of ideas to adequately answer the questions of his or her life? Also, intellectual ideas cannot prove or disprove their own ultimate viability and/or meaningfulness. So why would you trust a fortress of intellectual ideas to keep you safe and bring you to whole-being victory?

And yet, and yet. Friends, friends, what if we calm down? What if we don’t wear philosophical systems too tightly? What if we just put them on to try a new perspective, to help guide our thinking towards better ways to address our fundamental longing to know what is going on and what should be done about it? What if we just calm the fuck down?

Certainly, a philosophical system will never be literally True, nor ever completely inhabitable/livable by human beings.

However, while a human will never fit completely within a philosophical system — and what a nauseating limit, what a tragedy if a human could fit into a set of ideas! —, systems can help us coherently organize ourselves.

One must merely remember that the intellect’s not all we are: each human conscious moment contains feelings (including both emotions and sense-perceptions), ideas, senses-of-things (prior to ideas and feelings: ur-ideas and ur-feelings together, before differentiating into ideas and feelings; for example the inner sense that eventually gets estimated up into concepts like “what I say and do matters”; another word for “senses-of-things” might be “vague notions”), and — if the song within the storm is correct — most fundamentally a Something Deeper (aka: God, the Light within, etc — we’re poetically pointing through concepts towards what is ultimately prior to concepts) that alone knows what is really going on, what really matters, and what we should actually do. And it is an intellectually unproven and unprovable intellectual prejudice that these various aspects cannot interact meaningfully with one another, with thought-tools like language, and with other human beings. [there’s some translation required to translate, for example, feelings into ideas; and all translations are imperfect; but “imperfect” does not necessarily mean “inadequate”.]

Philosophical systems like those sketched in Plato’s Republic or the Buddha’s teachings can — so long as we don’t lose sight of the fact that human conceptual structures can only be imperfect ladders and platforms in one’s climb to more and more insight into and reliance upon the Truth within — help people organize their conscious moments around the Truth.

One can benefit from trying on, for example, the general sketch of living gently and peaceably while simultaneously reaching for and seeking to flow out of the Form of the Good at one’s center (the “Form of the Good” is here another poetic formulation for that Light within which alone is wise enough to adequately advise your thought as a whole). Playing within such a intellectual/emotional/spiritual framework — presuming you don’t forget it is just a human construct and not itself the Truth (aka: the Form of the Good; aka: God) — help you organize your thought-as-a-whole better and better.

Philosophy is always like Descarte’s “Meditations” in this regard: one person tries to intellectually think-through hisorher own experience of fundamental questions about knowledge, reality, meaning, and morality (ie: formulate a coherent intellectual response to them), and then invites others to try the logic on: to see how it fits their own experiences and thinking-throughs. Even if a philosophy doesn’t spell out a system for understanding reality, it presumes a system: people always do — we always carry within our assumptions more fundamental ones about how to take in, organize, analyze, and evaluate information. So a blatant philosophical system is actually more forthcoming than much philosophical thinking: it takes great pains to tell the reader where it is coming from.

Clutching systems too tightly is indeed destructive, as trying to turn mere human ideas into eternal Truths must be; but humans need some intellectual beliefs to keep their intellects grounded and coherent, and we in any case cannot help but trust some general heuristics for how one should approach life (aka: systems) and we cannot help but believe some things (indeed radical skepticism—supposing that you need to disbelieve everything—is, self-defeatingly, both a system and belief).

So enjoy creating and using philosophical systems! Don’t clutch them too tightly, but that goes for all merely human constructs. We are merely humans, so we need to build and use merely human constructs, but our Good cannot be contained within them, because the do not adequately understand and respond to Love.

Authors: Sommerset Gone and B Willard
Copyright: AMW and Andy Watson

Something Deeperism: Individuals & Groups

Something Deeperism: Individuals & Groups

Something Deeperism for individuals:

Nothing can make sense or matter to humans unless we can know/understand/follow what is actually going on and what actually matters (without adequate insight into Truth, we wander forever about in opinion, conjecture, and arguments with their counterarguments).
And the Truth has to be prior to ideas and feelings about the Truth, but we humans have a tendency to clench ideas and feelings about the Truth so tightly that we focus more on them than on a whole-being organization around the Truth within, which alone could adequately relate what is prior to ideas and feelings to ideas and feelings to ideas and feelings and thus to our specific day-to-day experiences and choices.

For the reasons above we adopt a minimal dogmatism that speaks to both our minds and our hearts, and a refusal to ever abandon that essential starting-point for progress in thought and action: “It matters what I say and do. I should be kind to myself and others. If my ideas and feelings are moving me away from aware, clear, and honest thought and feeling, away from kindness and compassion, away from a growing active insight into the Light within that knows that I matter and others matter and how we should think and act as individuals and in relationship with one another–then my ideas and feelings are undermining my true purpose and real goal; and so I must stop, rethink, find a way towards better ideas and feelings.” Because insofar as we abandon that within that knows how to find out what is going on and what should be done, we contradict all our efforts, undermine ourselves, aren’t even at a starting point.

That isn’t to stay one should stay at the starting point. It isn’t enough just to assume that minimal dogmatism. One must find a way to allow one’s thought-as-a-whole to get better and better at understanding how and in what way that tenet is True. Otherwise, one goes further and further towards ideas-about what really matters, and further and further away from a whole-being-engagement with what really matters (which must, as we’ve noted, be prior to ideas-about what really matters).

Something Deeperism for groups:

Since humans can make no progress without refusing to overstep or abandon something along the lines of the Something Deeperist’s minimal dogmatism, groups should agree to also not overstep or abandon that general direction. That is to say: people should be free to believe as their conscious bids them, but the group should never pretend like truth, clarity, accuracy and honesty, as well as kindness, compassion, win-win, community, joy and other basic inborn and necessary human values are up for doubt, or can ever be set aside for some supposed “higher truth”. It creates chaos (internal meaninglessness and thus the inability to coherently choose one direction over another) in both individuals and groups when doctrines are allowed to doubt or belittle what we humans have to know/believe/care-about in order to make any progress in their thoughts and actions.

So we, speaking poetically so as to avoid unnecessary (though not necessarily inaccurate) metaphysical dogmas, we do hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

The point is that whatever philosophy or religion you can imagine, to the degree it asks you to think illogically or dishonestly or confusedly or to be unkind it loses meaning to you and so turns to chaos, to mush, to a dogma that–since illegible to your mind and heart, but claiming absolute authority–can be used to justify anything. So let us agree that the only way forward for an individual is to find a Truth that does not ask one to think sloppily or to be unkind; and that therefore we as a group must also value good, clear thought and real kindness so much that we do not put up with any doctrines or behaviors that undermine these goods. Otherwise, how can we create a place where we can all be our best truest selves and meaningfully relate to one another? How else can we create a space where togetherness and jointly thinking, choosing, and creating is possible? And if this is not the goal of a group of humans, what meaning does that group really have? I mean: give me a break! Throw us a bone, here!

In the morning light

In the morning light

All that was in yesternight
enclosed and clenched within belly blossom hunch
in morning bright flew out rustling pigeon wings.

All kept tightly wrapped within
this silver purse, her gold strings tinselled out
and rubbing off onto your soft lenten hands–
cannot stay behind the swirling billowing fibs.
Not any longer. OK?

We wooshed and we gooshed, we twirled and we turned.
We spun and we kicked, we hazzahed and we hahaed
up and down the white stone alley ways.
But now our bikes are lying on the lawn
and we’ve settled into drifting couches
coarse in their cut and dusty up close.

We knew and we thought we’d think while we fought.
We dreamed and we drifted, our work a sifting out,
and now the angels pour down and surge up,
tackling us from all sides, and channeling us down
into the cold waters where we once played the clown.

You know who I am and we know where we are.
So let’s not pretend anymore.

Author: Mulligan Stew
Editor: BW
“What is this?”: AMW

Easy Pickings

Easy Pickings

If all you can think to do is scrunch up in a ball, what kind of a partner will you really be?

If you would fall in love with a sofa soft enough to sink into and with a tape recorder nearby looping “it’s OK, shhh, I love you” in a calm, electronic, female-frequency voice; how can you really get to know someone?

You’re easy pickings and that means you’re not ready to date.
But how could someone with seven tons of loneliness falling atop of them not be ready to date?
What else are they but ready to find someone, anyone?
Ah, there it goes again: anyone!

People need help. Systems slide apart. You could focus on things besides yourself.

No I can’t! I just can’t! Hold me! Understand my hurt and love me!

Tsk tsk. That’s not the way forward.

I don’t want to go forward. I want to stay here but held. Or no. That’s not quite. Never mi. I can’t say never mind. I can only say ne

Author: Ano Ny Mouse
Editor: BW
Tolerant Observer: AMW

The Girl For Me

The Girl For Me

Where’s the girl for me?
I’m sitting on my ass talking to my hands.

Where’s the girl for me?
I’m cutting circles in the christmas sand.

Where’s the girl for me?
I’m supposed to be writing or something.

Where’s the girl for me?

Author: LB Iddio

The Girl For Me

The Girl For Me

When show you up to party me, my dear?

I’ll come when I’m good and ready, my heart.

When you will kiss my neck and nuzzle in
with all your might because you mean it all.

Oh I’m not really sure when I’ll reach down
and push my hot so spicy part to you.

Come on! Don’t drive me crazy all life long!
Come and love me while I may still process touch!

Author: LB Iddio